<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data warehouse v master data repository</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyonsoftware.com/2006/03/data-warehouse-v-master-data-repository/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyonsoftware.com/2006/03/data-warehouse-v-master-data-repository/</link>
	<description>Andy Hayler, founder of Kalido and The Information Difference, gives his views on the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and data quality.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:22:13 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy on Enterprise Software &#187; Me 2 for Teradata MDM</title>
		<link>http://andyonsoftware.com/2006/03/data-warehouse-v-master-data-repository/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy on Enterprise Software &#187; Me 2 for Teradata MDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyonsoftware.com/?p=96#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] Teradata&#8217;s strong data warehouse offering has a much more natural fit to MDM, as indeed does any data warehouse vendor.Â  It makes sense for a data warehouse to sit alongside a separate master data repository, as I have written about previously.Â  Since I2&#8217;s MDM technology had a decent reputation (though rather limited customer deployments) Teradata&#8217;s strong channel and more natural technology fit should gain better traction for it, as well as plugging a gap in Teradata&#8217;s offerings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Teradata&#8217;s strong data warehouse offering has a much more natural fit to MDM, as indeed does any data warehouse vendor.Â  It makes sense for a data warehouse to sit alongside a separate master data repository, as I have written about previously.Â  Since I2&#8217;s MDM technology had a decent reputation (though rather limited customer deployments) Teradata&#8217;s strong channel and more natural technology fit should gain better traction for it, as well as plugging a gap in Teradata&#8217;s offerings. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

