Comments on: The Price of Failure http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/ Andy Hayler, founder of Kalido and The Information Difference, gives his views on the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and data quality. Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:22:13 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: 87% of BI projects do not live up to expectations « The SOA Guy http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-37079 87% of BI projects do not live up to expectations « The SOA Guy Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:24:01 +0000 http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/#comment-37079 [...] 87% of BI projects do not live up to expectations 9 08 2007 Andy Hayler annotates an Computer Business Review Online article, that according to a recent National Computing Centre survey, 87% of business intelligence projects in the UK do not live up to expectations. [...] [...] 87% of BI projects do not live up to expectations 9 08 2007 Andy Hayler annotates an Computer Business Review Online article, that according to a recent National Computing Centre survey, 87% of business intelligence projects in the UK do not live up to expectations. [...]

]]> By: DBM Forum » Blog Archive » Welkom….in Business Intelligence Hel http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-36831 DBM Forum » Blog Archive » Welkom….in Business Intelligence Hel Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:19:03 +0000 http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/#comment-36831 [...] Andy on Enterprise Software: The price of failure [...] [...] Andy on Enterprise Software: The price of failure [...]

]]> By: Ad http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-36474 Ad Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:05:15 +0000 http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/07/the-price-of-failure/#comment-36474 yeah spot on, but nothing new: the same reasons for failure were identified probably some 10-15 years ago. I remember BI projects from the 70ths and 80ths which were conducted not thanks to the IT dep, but in spite off. And they had their - serious -problems too, but they were user driven and user owned. Maybe just maybe when in the 90ths it became a good thing to have a data warehouse and IT got BI in his grip things changed?? After all do'nt forget BI is maybe good for as little as 5% of the IT spendings of a big company and than it is difficult to acknowledge that it might be a specialism in its own right with different "laws" to obey compared to the big transactional systems which are at the heart of an IT shop yeah spot on, but nothing new: the same reasons for failure were identified probably some 10-15 years ago.

I remember BI projects from the 70ths and 80ths which were conducted not thanks to the IT dep, but in spite off. And they had their – serious -problems too, but they were user driven and user owned. Maybe just maybe when in the 90ths it became a good thing to have a data warehouse and IT got BI in his grip things changed??
After all do’nt forget BI is maybe good for as little as 5% of the IT spendings of a big company and than it is difficult to acknowledge that it might be a specialism in its own right with different “laws” to obey compared to the big transactional systems which are at the heart of an IT shop

]]>