<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gaul of it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/</link>
	<description>Andy Hayler, founder of Kalido and The Information Difference, gives his views on the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and data quality.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:22:13 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-56025</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/#comment-56025</guid>
		<description>Fair point, but outside of customer data for telcos and a few other situations, most master data is not large in volume (e.g. product info, asset, or even &quot;customer&quot; in any B2B business). Complexity rather than volume is mostly the issue here, so I don&#039;t see why an XML database should not be a reasonable choice for this kind of application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, but outside of customer data for telcos and a few other situations, most master data is not large in volume (e.g. product info, asset, or even &#8220;customer&#8221; in any B2B business). Complexity rather than volume is mostly the issue here, so I don&#8217;t see why an XML database should not be a reasonable choice for this kind of application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-55998</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andyonsoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/#comment-55998</guid>
		<description>Berkeley DB comes in three flavours (basic key/value, a Java edition, and the XQuery/XML stuff). I suspect the bulk of mobile installations are of the basic/Java variety. Maybe this is a bit of a red herring as far as the suitability of an XML store for MDM goes?

Regards Nigel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berkeley DB comes in three flavours (basic key/value, a Java edition, and the XQuery/XML stuff). I suspect the bulk of mobile installations are of the basic/Java variety. Maybe this is a bit of a red herring as far as the suitability of an XML store for MDM goes?</p>
<p>Regards Nigel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

